Henrich, J. et al. Expensive punishments in all human societies. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127333 (2006).
Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions of Collective Action (Cambridge University Press, 1990).
Ostrom, E., Walker, J. & Gardner, R. Pacts with and without a sword: autonomy is possible. A m. Policy. Science. Round. 86404–417 (1992).
Fehr, E. & Gächter, S. Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. A m. Econ. Round. 90980–994 (2000).
Dreber, A., Rand, DG, Fudenberg, D. & Nowak, MA Winners don’t punish. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06723 (2008).
Rand, DG, Ohtsuki, H. & Nowak, MA Direct reciprocity with costly punishment: generous giving prevails. J. Theor. Biological. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.09.015 (2009).
Ohtsuki, H., Iwasa, Y. & Nowak, MA Indirect reciprocity provides only a small margin of effectiveness for costly punishment. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07601 (2009).
Sethi, R. & Somanathan, E. Understanding Reciprocity. J.Econ. Organ Behavior. 501–27 (2003).
Bowles, S. & Gintis, H. A cooperative species (Princeton Univ. Press, 2011).
Hauert, C., Traulsen, A., Brandt, H., Nowak, MA & Sigmund, K. Via Freedom to Coercion: The Emergence of Costly Punishment. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1141588 (2007).
Brandt, H., Hauert, C. & Sigmund, K. Punishment and reputation in spatial public goods games. proc. R. Soc. B https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2336 (2003).
Helbing, D., Szolnoki, A., Perc, M. & Szabó, G. Evolutionary establishment of moral standards and double morals through spatial interactions. PLoS calculation. Biological. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000758 (2010).
Helbing, D., Szolnoki, A., Perc, M. & Szabó, G. Punish, but not too hard: How expensive punishment spills over into the spatial public goods game. New J. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/12/8/083005 (2010).
Perc, M. & Szolnoki, A. Self-organization of punishment in structured populations. New J. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/14/4/043013 (2012).
Boyd, R., Gintis, H. & Bowles, S. Coordinated punishment of defectors supports cooperation and can proliferate when it is rare. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183665 (2010).
Sigmund, K., De Silva, H., Traulsen, A. & Hauert, C. Social learning promotes institutions to govern the commons. Nature 466861–863 (2010).
Hilbe, C., Traulsen, A., Röhl, T. & Milinski, M. Democratic decisions establish stable authorities that overcome the paradox of second-order punishment. proc. Natl Acad. Science. UNITED STATES 111752–756 (2014).
Murphy, B. The Punisher’s Brain: The Evolution of Judge and Jury. By Hoffman, Morris B. Pp. xi, 359. Cambridge/NY, Cambridge University Press, 2014, £21.99/$30.00. Heythrop J. https://doi.org/10.1111/heyj.12249_81 (2015).
Gruter, M. & Masters, RD Ostracism as a social and biological phenomenon: an introduction. Ethol. Sociobiolo. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(86)90043-9 (1986).
Molleman, L., Kölle, F., Starmer, C. & Gächter, S. People prefer coordinated punishment in cooperative interactions. Nat. Hmm. Behavior https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0707-2 (2019).
Szolnoki, A., Szabó, G. & Perc, M. Phase diagrams for spatial public goods game with pool punishment. Phys. Rev. E https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.83.036101 (2011).
Ostrom, E. Collective action and changing social norms. J.Econ. Perspective. 14137–158 (2000).
Platteau, J.-P. Institutions, social norms and economic development Flight. 1 (Psychology Press, 2000).
van den Bergh, JCJM, Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. & Munda, G. Alternative models of individual behavior and implications for environmental policy. School. Econ. 3243–61 (2000).
Traulsen, A., Nowak, MA & Pacheco, JM Stochastic dynamics of invasion and fixation. Phys. Rev. E 7411909 (2006).
Dequech, D. Institutions, Social Norms, and Decision Theory Norms. J.Econ. Organ Behavior. 7270–78 (2009).
Dunn, SP Bounded Rationality Is Not Fundamental Uncertainty: A Post-Keynesian Perspective. J. Post Keynes. Econ. 23567-587 (2001).
Levin, S. The difficulty of discounting tomorrow. Solutions 320–24 (2012).
Alford, RP The proliferation of international courts and tribunals: international judgment on the rise. In proc. Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law Flight. 94, 160–165 (Cambridge University Press, 2000).
Dunn, LA Contain nuclear proliferation (International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1991).
Potoski, M. Green Clubs in Building Climate Change Regimes. Climate change 14453–63 (2017).
Trzyna, TC, Margold, E. & Osborn, JK World Directory of Environmental Organizations: Handbook of National and International Organizations and Programs, Governmental and Non-Governmental, Concerned with the Protection of the Earth’s Resources Flight. 5 (Earthscan, 1996).
Dixit, A. & Levin, S. en The Theory of Externalities and Public Goods: Essays in Memory of Richard C. Cornes (eds Buchholz, W. and Rübbelke, D.) 127–143 (Springer, 2017); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49442-5_7
Vasconcelos, VV, Santos, FC & Pacheco, JM A bottom-up institutional approach to cooperative governance of risky commons. Nat. Air conditioning Switch 3797–801 (2013).
Vasconcelos, VV, Santos, FC & Pacheco, JM Cooperative dynamics of polycentric climate governance. Math. Model. Methods Appl. Science. 252503-2517 (2015).
Ostrom, E. Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. A m. Econ. Round. 100641–672 (2010).
Vasconcelos, VV, Hannam, PM, Levin, SA & Pacheco, JM Coalition-structured governance improves cooperation to deliver public goods. Science. representing ten9194 (2020).
Nyborg, K. et al. Social norms as solutions. Science 35442–43 (2016).
Hannam, PM, Vasconcelos, VV, Levin, SA & Pacheco, JM Incomplete cooperation and co-benefits: deepening climate cooperation with a proliferation of small agreements. Climate change 14465–79 (2017).
Markussen, T., Putterman, L. & Tyran, J.-R. Self-Organization for Collective Action: An Experimental Study of Voting on Sanctions Regimes. Rev. Econ. Standard. 81301–324 (2014).
Gürerk, Ö., Irlenbusch, B. & Rockenbach, B. The competitive advantage of sanctioning institutions. Science 312108-111 (2006).
Dannenberg, A. & Gallier, C. The choice of institutions to solve cooperative problems: a survey of experimental research. Exp. Eco. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-019-09629-8 (2019).
Bühren, C. & Dannenberg, A. The demand for punishment to promote cooperation among like-minded people. EUR. Econ. Round. 138103862 (2021).
Radzvilavicius, AL, Kessinger, TA & Plotkin, JB Adherence to public institutions that promote cooperation. Nat. Commmon. 123567 (2021).