Punitive institutions selected and supported through voting and learning

  • Henrich, J. et al. Expensive punishments in all human societies. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127333 (2006).

  • Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions of Collective Action (Cambridge University Press, 1990).

  • Ostrom, E., Walker, J. & Gardner, R. Pacts with and without a sword: autonomy is possible. A m. Policy. Science. Round. 86404–417 (1992).

    Google Scholar article

  • Fehr, E. & Gächter, S. Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. A m. Econ. Round. 90980–994 (2000).

    Google Scholar article

  • Dreber, A., Rand, DG, Fudenberg, D. & Nowak, MA Winners don’t punish. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06723 (2008).

  • Rand, DG, Ohtsuki, H. & Nowak, MA Direct reciprocity with costly punishment: generous giving prevails. J. Theor. Biological. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.09.015 (2009).

  • Ohtsuki, H., Iwasa, Y. & Nowak, MA Indirect reciprocity provides only a small margin of effectiveness for costly punishment. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07601 (2009).

  • Sethi, R. & Somanathan, E. Understanding Reciprocity. J.Econ. Organ Behavior. 501–27 (2003).

    Google Scholar article

  • Bowles, S. & Gintis, H. A cooperative species (Princeton Univ. Press, 2011).

  • Hauert, C., Traulsen, A., Brandt, H., Nowak, MA & Sigmund, K. Via Freedom to Coercion: The Emergence of Costly Punishment. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1141588 (2007).

  • Brandt, H., Hauert, C. & Sigmund, K. Punishment and reputation in spatial public goods games. proc. R. Soc. B https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2336 (2003).

  • Helbing, D., Szolnoki, A., Perc, M. & Szabó, G. Evolutionary establishment of moral standards and double morals through spatial interactions. PLoS calculation. Biological. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000758 (2010).

  • Helbing, D., Szolnoki, A., Perc, M. & Szabó, G. Punish, but not too hard: How expensive punishment spills over into the spatial public goods game. New J. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/12/8/083005 (2010).

  • Perc, M. & Szolnoki, A. Self-organization of punishment in structured populations. New J. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/14/4/043013 (2012).

  • Boyd, R., Gintis, H. & Bowles, S. Coordinated punishment of defectors supports cooperation and can proliferate when it is rare. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183665 (2010).

  • Sigmund, K., De Silva, H., Traulsen, A. & Hauert, C. Social learning promotes institutions to govern the commons. Nature 466861–863 (2010).

    CAS Google Scholar Article

  • Hilbe, C., Traulsen, A., Röhl, T. & Milinski, M. Democratic decisions establish stable authorities that overcome the paradox of second-order punishment. proc. Natl Acad. Science. UNITED STATES 111752–756 (2014).

    CAS Google Scholar Article

  • Murphy, B. The Punisher’s Brain: The Evolution of Judge and Jury. By Hoffman, Morris B. Pp. xi, 359. Cambridge/NY, Cambridge University Press, 2014, £21.99/$30.00. Heythrop J. https://doi.org/10.1111/heyj.12249_81 (2015).

  • Gruter, M. & Masters, RD Ostracism as a social and biological phenomenon: an introduction. Ethol. Sociobiolo. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(86)90043-9 (1986).

  • Molleman, L., Kölle, F., Starmer, C. & Gächter, S. People prefer coordinated punishment in cooperative interactions. Nat. Hmm. Behavior https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0707-2 (2019).

  • Szolnoki, A., Szabó, G. & Perc, M. Phase diagrams for spatial public goods game with pool punishment. Phys. Rev. E https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.83.036101 (2011).

  • Ostrom, E. Collective action and changing social norms. J.Econ. Perspective. 14137–158 (2000).

    Google Scholar article

  • Platteau, J.-P. Institutions, social norms and economic development Flight. 1 (Psychology Press, 2000).

  • van den Bergh, JCJM, Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. & Munda, G. Alternative models of individual behavior and implications for environmental policy. School. Econ. 3243–61 (2000).

    Google Scholar article

  • Traulsen, A., Nowak, MA & Pacheco, JM Stochastic dynamics of invasion and fixation. Phys. Rev. E 7411909 (2006).

    Google Scholar article

  • Dequech, D. Institutions, Social Norms, and Decision Theory Norms. J.Econ. Organ Behavior. 7270–78 (2009).

    Google Scholar article

  • Dunn, SP Bounded Rationality Is Not Fundamental Uncertainty: A Post-Keynesian Perspective. J. Post Keynes. Econ. 23567-587 (2001).

    Google Scholar article

  • Levin, S. The difficulty of discounting tomorrow. Solutions 320–24 (2012).

    Google Scholar

  • Alford, RP The proliferation of international courts and tribunals: international judgment on the rise. In proc. Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law Flight. 94, 160–165 (Cambridge University Press, 2000).

  • Dunn, LA Contain nuclear proliferation (International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1991).

  • Potoski, M. Green Clubs in Building Climate Change Regimes. Climate change 14453–63 (2017).

    Google Scholar article

  • Trzyna, TC, Margold, E. & Osborn, JK World Directory of Environmental Organizations: Handbook of National and International Organizations and Programs, Governmental and Non-Governmental, Concerned with the Protection of the Earth’s Resources Flight. 5 (Earthscan, 1996).

  • Dixit, A. & Levin, S. en The Theory of Externalities and Public Goods: Essays in Memory of Richard C. Cornes (eds Buchholz, W. and Rübbelke, D.) 127–143 (Springer, 2017); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49442-5_7

  • Vasconcelos, VV, Santos, FC & Pacheco, JM A bottom-up institutional approach to cooperative governance of risky commons. Nat. Air conditioning Switch 3797–801 (2013).

    Google Scholar article

  • Vasconcelos, VV, Santos, FC & Pacheco, JM Cooperative dynamics of polycentric climate governance. Math. Model. Methods Appl. Science. 252503-2517 (2015).

    Google Scholar article

  • Ostrom, E. Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. A m. Econ. Round. 100641–672 (2010).

    Google Scholar article

  • Vasconcelos, VV, Hannam, PM, Levin, SA & Pacheco, JM Coalition-structured governance improves cooperation to deliver public goods. Science. representing ten9194 (2020).

    CAS Google Scholar Article

  • Nyborg, K. et al. Social norms as solutions. Science 35442–43 (2016).

    CAS Google Scholar Article

  • Hannam, PM, Vasconcelos, VV, Levin, SA & Pacheco, JM Incomplete cooperation and co-benefits: deepening climate cooperation with a proliferation of small agreements. Climate change 14465–79 (2017).

    Google Scholar article

  • Markussen, T., Putterman, L. & Tyran, J.-R. Self-Organization for Collective Action: An Experimental Study of Voting on Sanctions Regimes. Rev. Econ. Standard. 81301–324 (2014).

    Google Scholar article

  • Gürerk, Ö., Irlenbusch, B. & Rockenbach, B. The competitive advantage of sanctioning institutions. Science 312108-111 (2006).

    Google Scholar article

  • Dannenberg, A. & Gallier, C. The choice of institutions to solve cooperative problems: a survey of experimental research. Exp. Eco. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-019-09629-8 (2019).

  • Bühren, C. & Dannenberg, A. The demand for punishment to promote cooperation among like-minded people. EUR. Econ. Round. 138103862 (2021).

  • Radzvilavicius, AL, Kessinger, TA & Plotkin, JB Adherence to public institutions that promote cooperation. Nat. Commmon. 123567 (2021).

    CAS Google Scholar Article